Use
highlighters -
Take note of any and all points of interest in the text. If
you've got a thesis in mind already, use several different
colors of highlighter, each for information relevant to a
separate prong of your argument. This will make your life much
easier when you go back to integrate your sources,
particularly if you've got an extensive amount of text to
cover.
Look
for patterns - Be aware of recurring
techniques-both literary and rhetorical-which the author uses
to illustrate a concept. Specific sorts of imagery, allusion,
or dialogue, which seem to be similar or related inevitably,
reveal a larger intention that can be made into an argument.
Ask
questions -
In expository work, continually ask yourself "Is this
true? What evidence supports this statement? Can other
conclusions be drawn from the facts of this text?" By
deciding whether or not you agree with the arguments of your
source, you'll begin to crystallize more subtle arguments of
your own. In literature, question the author's purpose in
using particular narrative structures. "Why is this
metaphor used? What does the comparison signify? Why do we
learn this particular piece of information in such a manner?
Why is the setting dwelled on so much in this passage? What is
the relationship between setting and character?” Write
these questions in the margins as you go along.
Get
down to the details - One of the
most sophisticated close reading techniques you can
incorporate into your work is an analysis of the multiple
connotations of a specific word. Be aware of every single word
the author uses. When you find one of particular interest,
literally look it up in the dictionary and consider how each
and every definition might be applied to the text. Even if the
author uses it with one literal definition in mind, see if the
connotations of the other definitions can be applied to your
idea (This is particularly true of Shakespeare).
Consider
the source in relation to other texts - If
something in the work reminds you of something else you've
read, there's quite possibly a good reason why. Consider how
your source is a response to or a continuation of other texts.
Always be on the look out for Christ symbolism and Greek
mythological allusions; both are fairly easy to spot and can
be effectively analyzed in support of a particular
interpretation.
An
Example:
From
Coleridge's Kubla Kahn: "In Xanadu did
Kubla Kahn a pleasure dome decree; Where Alph the sacred
river ran through caverns measureless to man; into a sunless
sea."
Your
assignment is to write about how the poem illustrates the
power of human creativity. In light of this, here are some
questions to ask yourself right off the bat:
-
Why
does Coleridge select an Oriental locale and a
historical figure to open his work?
-
What
is the significance of the word "pleasure,"
"measureless," "sunless"?
-
What
is Alph, and does Coleridge use it as the setting for
his poem?
Answering
these questions might involve a consideration of distance,
in both time and space, related to the vastness of human
capacity. You might also consider "measureless"
and "sunless" as descriptive of types of
knowledge or ignorance; in breaching the "sunless"
sea with his dome, what sort of power is Kubla Kahn
exhibiting? A trip to the dictionary (or, more likely,
a glance at the inevitable foot note) will provide the
information that the Alph is a magical river in mythology.
This begs the question, "how does a fantastic
setting relate to Coleridge's view of the imagination?”